City of Costa Mesa Banner
File #: 24-114    Version: 1
Type: Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/26/2024 In control: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY*
On agenda: 4/2/2024 Final action:
Title: REJECT ALL BIDS - WILSON, WAKEHAM, AND TEWINKLE PARKS BRIDGES REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 23-12
Attachments: 1. Agenda Report, 2. 1. Bid Abstract
TITLE:
title
REJECT ALL BIDS - WILSON, WAKEHAM, AND TEWINKLE PARKS BRIDGES REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 23-12
end
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
PRESENTED BY: RAJA SETHURAMAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
CONTACT INFORMATION: SEUNG YANG, P.E., CITY ENGINEER, (714) 754-5335

RECOMMENDATION:
recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council reject all bids for the Wilson, Wakeham, and TeWinkle Parks Bridges Replacement Project, City Project No. 23-12.
end
BACKGROUND:
The Wilson, Wakeham, and TeWinkle Parks Bridges Replacement Project consisted of replacing all the wooden bridges at Wilson Park and the single wooden bridge at TeWinkle Park and Wakeham Park with new pedestrian bridges.

The existing pedestrian bridges at these parks have been in steady deterioration over time. Exposure to the natural elements has caused rotting and decay in certain areas of the bridges. Temporary repairs have been made over the years, which only endure for a short period of time.

The initial scope of this project was to replace the existing pedestrian bridges by awarding a contractor to procure, deliver, and install new bridges at Wilson, Wakeham, and TeWinkle Parks.

ANALYSIS:
On February 8, 2024, staff received twenty (20) bids for this project. The bid abstract is shown in Attachment 1. Staff has reviewed all bids and determined the lowest responsive bid from Boulder Contracting Company with a bid of $294,089. The first two bidders, 3M Construction Corporation and Harbor Coating & Restoration were deemed non-responsive.

The third lowest bidder, Boulder Contracting Company, protested the first two low bidders citing a violation of the General Provision that no person, company, or entity can submit more than one bid. In this case, both companies, 3M Construction Corporation and Harbor Coating & Restoration shared a corporate officer that was listed in both bids and had financial interest in both companies. Therefore, staff determined that 3M C...

Click here for full text